COMMANDMENT NO. 7: Beware of transactions in quick Succession involving the same property.
For better or worse, our society some-times rewards speculation, and the "quick flip" of real estate can be perfectly legitimate. In proper circumstances, even back-to-back escrows are appropriate. However, many fraudulent schemes start with a series of sales between real or made-up parties, or between family members, with the sole objective of increasing the stated price (but not the actual value) of the real property which is then used as collateral for a loan. Invariably, the amount of the loan will far exceed the actual value of the real property, and the escrow and title companies will be blamed when the borrower defaults after a single monthly loan payment or no payments at all. Again, this type of fraudulent scheme is difficult to spot where only one property is involved but becomes more apparent when the "satisfied customer" brings in multiple similar transactions, or when there are several uninsured transfers within a short period of time, often between family members.
COMMANDMENT NO. 8: Avoid accommodation recordings.
An accommodation recording is the recording of a notarized document which does not relate to an open escrow. The escrow officer typically records the document as a favor to a customer in the hope of being engaged for a future transaction concerning the subject property or some other property. The escrow officer does not charge a fee for the service. Many escrow officers think that, because no fee is charged, there can be no liability. Unfortunately, as more than one court has declared, this notion of simple fairness is simply incorrect.
Accommodation recordings expose an escrow company to claims of "aiding and abetting" a fraud, if one occurs, even without any reward or compensation to the escrow company.
Accommodation recordings result in a disproportionately higher percent-age of claims than transactions where the escrow company opens an escrow as part of a real transaction and charges for its services. Perhaps the best service the escrow can provide is to direct the party requesting an accommodation recording to the County Recorder's office.
COMMANDMENT NO. 9: Watch out when the buyer receives money from (rather than pays money into) escrow.
If something seems too good to be true, it usually is. This is often the case in a "net cash to buyer" transaction. Many fraudulent schemes, often involving double escrows, reveal a buyer who is acquiring title and simultaneously receiving proceeds out of escrow on a loan that is premised on a fraudulently inflated property value. Since these types of scams usually involve a series of loans from a single lender, the perpetrator needs to get the loan proceeds released to him-self. One giveaway is the instruction on multiple "net cash to buyer" loans (usually in the form of an assignment of proceeds) that the escrow pay the loan proceeds directly from escrow to a single payee who is not a party to the transaction. The payee is probably orchestrating a fraudulent scheme against an unsuspecting lender who has not taken adequate steps to appraise the real property security accurately.
COMMANDMENT NO. 10: Be wary of requests for reports that do not reflect the true current state of affairs.
The purpose of a preliminary report is to facilitate the sale of title insurance, and deviation from this purpose invites trouble. Years ago, customers would sometimes request a report with a specific "as of" date that did not show more recent transactions affecting the property. Such special ordered reports of title were used to memorialize the state of title at a particular time for the purpose of documenting certain tax-oriented transactions.
Unfortunately, backdated reports have also been used to mislead investors or lenders concerning ownership of property that was sold or encumbered after the last date shown on the report. Even if requested by a good customer (see Commandment No. 3), and even if you think you understand the purpose (see Commandment No. 2), do not provide custom-tailored reports that could be used for misleading purposes. To the extent a proper title product is desired to freeze-frame a past state of title for a legitimate purpose, check with the underwriter or legal counsel and, if permitted to proceed, make sure that the report discloses in bold print, in a location where it would be difficult to redact, that subsequent events may have changed the state of title after the last date covered by the report.
CONCLUSION
While nothing can make escrow and title companies "bulletproof" from fraud, the Ten Commandments set forth above may help to alert escrow and title officers to danger signs.
(This article was provided as a public service, courtesy of the distinguished Shartsis Friese LLP).